banner



Home  ›  How Does Carrying Capacity Affect The Size Of A Population

How Does Carrying Capacity Affect The Size Of A Population

Written By Sunday, April 17, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Maximum population size of a species that an surroundings can support indefinitely

The conveying chapters of an environment is the maximum population size of a biological species that tin be sustained by that specific environs, given the food, habitat, water, and other resources available. The carrying chapters is defined equally the surround'southward maximal load, which in population ecology corresponds to the population equilibrium, when the number of deaths in a population equals the number of births (as well every bit clearing and emigration). The event of conveying capacity on population dynamics is modelled with a logistic function. Carrying capacity is applied to the maximum population an surroundings can support in ecology, agriculture and fisheries. The term conveying chapters has been applied to a few different processes in the past before finally being applied to population limits in the 1950s.[1] The notion of conveying capacity for humans is covered past the notion of sustainable population.

At the global scale, scientific information indicates that humans are living beyond the carrying capacity of planet Earth and that this cannot continue indefinitely. This scientific evidence comes from many sources but is presented in item in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, in ecological footprint accounts,[2] or planetary boundaries research.[3] An early on detailed examination of global limits was published in the 1972 volume Limits to Growth, which has prompted follow-up commentary and analysis.[four] A 2012 review in Nature by 22 international researchers expressed concerns that the Globe may be "budgeted a state shift" in its biosphere.[five]

Origins [edit]

In terms of population dynamics, the term 'carrying capacity' was not explicitly used in 1838 by the Belgian mathematician Pierre François Verhulst when he first published his equations based on research on modelling population growth.[half dozen]

The origins of the term "carrying capacity" are uncertain, with sources variously stating that it was originally used "in the context of international shipping" in the 1840s,[vii] [eight] or that it was showtime used during 19th-century laboratory experiments with micro-organisms.[nine] A 2008 review finds the first employ of the term in English was an 1845 study by the United states of america Secretarial assistant of State to the United states of america Senate. It so became a term used generally in biology in the 1870s, being most developed in wild fauna and livestock management in the early 1900s.[eight] It had get a staple term in ecology used to define the biological limits of a natural system related to population size in the 1950s.[7] [8]

Neo-Malthusians and eugenicists popularised the utilize of the words to describe the number of people the Earth tin support in the 1950s,[eight] although American biostatisticians Raymond Pearl and Lowell Reed had already practical it in these terms to human populations in the 1920s.[ citation needed ]

Hadwen and Palmer (1923) defined carrying capacity as the density of stock that could be grazed for a definite menstruum without damage to the range.[ten] [eleven]

It was first used in the context of wildlife management by the American Aldo Leopold in 1933, and a year later by the too American Paul Lester Errington, a wetlands specialist. Both used the term in dissimilar ways, Leopold largely in the sense of grazing animals (differentiating between a 'saturation level', an intrinsic level of density a species would live in, and carrying capacity, the nearly animals which could exist in the field) and Errington defining 'carrying capacity' equally the number of animals in a higher place which predation would become 'heavy' (this definition has largely been rejected, including by Errington himself).[10] [12] The important and popular 1953 textbook on environmental by Eugene Odum, Fundamentals of Environmental, popularised the term in its modern significant as the equilibrium value of the logistic model of population growth.[10] [xiii]

Mathematics [edit]

The specific reason why a population stops growing is known as a limiting or regulating cistron.[ commendation needed ]

Reaching carrying chapters through a logistic growth curve

The difference between the birth charge per unit and the death rate is the natural increment. If the population of a given organism is beneath the carrying capacity of a given environment, this environment could support a positive natural increase; should it find itself above that threshold the population typically decreases.[14] Thus, the conveying capacity is the maximum number of individuals of a species that an environment tin can support.[fifteen]

Population size decreases above conveying capacity due to a range of factors depending on the species concerned, but tin can include bereft space, food supply, or sunlight. The carrying capacity of an environment may vary for different species.[ citation needed ]

In the standard ecological algebra every bit illustrated in the simplified Verhulst model of population dynamics, carrying capacity is represented past the constant One thousand:

d N d t = r N ( 1 − N K ) {\displaystyle {\frac {dN}{dt}}=rN\left(1-{\frac {Due north}{M}}\right)}

where

N is the population size,

r is the intrinsic growth charge per unit

K is the conveying chapters of the local environment, and

dN/dt , the derivative of N with respect to time t, is the charge per unit of change in population with time.

Thus, the equation relates the growth rate of the population N to the current population size, incorporating the consequence of the two constant parameters r and Thousand. (Notation that decrease is negative growth.) The pick of the letter K came from the German Kapazitätsgrenze (capacity limit).

This equation is a modification of the original Verhulst model:

d Northward d t = r N − α N 2 {\displaystyle {\frac {dN}{dt}}=rN-\blastoff North^{2}} [16]

In this equation, the conveying capacity Thousand, N ∗ {\displaystyle N^{*}} , is

N ∗ = r α . {\displaystyle N^{*}={\frac {r}{\blastoff }}.}

This is a graph of the population due to the logistic curve model. When the population is above the carrying capacity it decreases, and when information technology is beneath the carrying capacity information technology increases.

When the Verhulst model is plotted into a graph, the population alter over time takes the form of a sigmoid curve, reaching its highest level at Yard. This is the logistic growth curve and information technology is calculated with:

f ( x ) = L 1 + e − k ( x − x 0 ) , {\displaystyle f(ten)={\frac {Fifty}{1+e^{-one thousand(x-x_{0})}}},}

where

east is the natural logarithm base (also known as Euler's number),
ten 0 is the x value of the sigmoid's midpoint,
50 is the curve'south maximum value,
K is the logistic growth charge per unit or steepness of the curve [17] and
f ( ten 0 ) = 50 / 2. {\displaystyle f(x_{0})=L/two.}

The logistic growth bend depicts how population growth rate and the carrying capacity are inter-continued. As illustrated in the logistic growth curve model, when the population size is small, the population increases exponentially. However, as population size nears the carrying capacity, the growth decreases and reaches nada at One thousand.[18]

What determines a specific system's carrying capacity involves a limiting cistron which may exist something such every bit available supplies of nutrient, water, nesting areas, space or corporeality of waste that can be absorbed. Where resource are finite, such as for a population of Osedax on a whale fall or bacteria in a petridish, the population will curve back down to zilch afterwards the resource have been exhausted, with the curve reaching its apogee at K. In systems in which resources are constantly replenished, the population will achieve its equilibrium at K.[ citation needed ]

Software is bachelor to help calculate the carrying capacity of a given natural environment.[nineteen]

Population environmental [edit]

Carrying chapters is a ordinarily used method for biologists when trying to ameliorate understand biological populations and the factors which affect them.[i] When addressing biological populations, carrying capacity tin can exist used every bit a stable dynamic equilibrium, taking into account extinction and colonization rates.[14] In population biology, logistic growth assumes that population size fluctuates above and beneath an equilibrium value.[twenty]

Numerous authors accept questioned the usefulness of the term when applied to bodily wild populations.[10] [11] [21] Although useful in theory and in laboratory experiments, the utilise of conveying chapters as a method of measuring population limits in the surround is less useful as information technology assumes no interactions between species.[xiv]

Agronomics [edit]

Computing the carrying capacity of a paddock in Australia is done in Dry Sheep Equivalents (DSEs). A single DSE is 50 kg Merino wether, dry ewe or non-pregnant ewe, which is maintained in a stable condition. Not only sheep are calculated in DSEs, the carrying capacity for other livestock is besides calculated using this measure. A 200 kg weaned dogie of a British style breed gaining 0.25 kg/twenty-four hours is 5.5DSE, merely if the same weight of the same type of calf were gaining 0.75 kg/twenty-four hour period, it would be measure at 8DSE. Cattle are not all the same, their DSEs tin vary depending on brood, growth rates, weights, if it is a cow ('dam'), steer or ox ('bullock' in Australia), and if it weaning, pregnant or 'moisture' (i.eastward. lactating). It is important for farmers to calculate the carrying chapters of their land so they can establish a sustainable stocking rate.[22] In other parts of the world unlike units are used for computing carrying capacities. In the Uk the paddock is measured in LU, livestock units, although dissimilar schemes exist for this.[23] [24] New Zealand uses either LU,[25] EE (ewe equivalents) or SU (stock units).[26] In the USA and Canada the traditional organization uses animal units (AU).[27] A French/Swiss unit of measurement is Unité de Gros Bétail (UGB).[28] [29]

In some European countries such every bit Switzerland the pasture (alm or alp) is traditionally measured in Stoß, with 1 Stoß equalling four Füße (feet). A more modern European organization is Großvieheinheit (GV or GVE), respective to 500 kg in liveweight of cattle. In extensive agronomics 2 GV/ha is a common stocking charge per unit, in intensive agriculture, when grazing is supplemented with extra provender, rates tin can be 5 to ten GV/ha.[ commendation needed ] In Europe boilerplate stocking rates vary depending on the land, in 2000 the Netherlands and Kingdom of belgium had a very rate of 3.82 GV/ha and 3.19 GV/ha respectively, surrounding countries accept rates of effectually i to 1.5 GV/ha, and more southern European countries have lower rates, with Spain having the lowest rate of 0.44 GV/ha.[30] This system can besides be applied to natural areas. Grazing megaherbivores at roughly one GV/ha is considered sustainable in central European grasslands, although this varies widely depending on many factors. In ecology information technology is theoretically (i.e. cyclic succession, patch dynamics, Megaherbivorenhypothese) taken that a grazing pressure of 0.iii GV/ha by wild fauna is plenty to hinder afforestation in a natural area. Considering different species have different ecological niches, with horses for example grazing short grass, cattle longer grass, and goats or deer preferring to scan shrubs, niche differentiation allows a terrain to accept slightly higher carrying capacity for a mixed group of species, than it would if there were only one species involved.[ citation needed ]

Some niche market schemes mandate lower stocking rates than tin can maximally be grazed on a pasture. In lodge to market ones' meat products as 'biodynamic', a lower Großvieheinheit of 1 to one.5 (2.0) GV/ha is mandated, with some farms having an operating structure using only 0.v to 0.8 GV/ha.[ citation needed ]

The Food and Agriculture Organization has introduced three international units: FAO Livestock Units for North America,[31] [32] FAO Livestock Units for sub-Saharan Africa,[31] [32] and Tropical Livestock Units.[33]

Another rougher and less precise method of determining the conveying capacity of a paddock is simply by looking objectively at the status of the herd. In Australia, the national standardized system for rating livestock weather condition is done by torso condition scoring (BCS). An animate being in a very poor status is scored with a BCS of 0, and an animal which is extremely healthy is scored at five: animals may be scored between these two numbers in increments of 0.25. At least 25 animals of the same type must be scored to provide a statistically representative number, and scoring must take place monthly -if the average falls, this may be due to a stocking charge per unit above the paddock's carrying chapters or too little fodder. This method is less direct for determining stocking rates than looking at the pasture itself, considering the changes in the condition of the stock may lag behind changes in the status of the pasture.[22]

Fisheries [edit]

A fishery at sunset in Cochin, Kerala, India.

In fisheries, the carrying capacity is used in the formulae to calculate sustainable yields for fisheries direction.[34] The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is defined as "the highest average catch that can be continuously taken from an exploited population (=stock) nether average environmental conditions". It was originally calculated as half of the carrying chapters, but has been refined over the years,[35] now being seen as roughly xxx% of the population, depending on the species or population.[36] [37] Because the population of a species which is brought below its carrying capacity due to angling volition discover itself in the exponential stage of growth, equally seen in the Verhulst model, the harvesting of an amount of fish at or beneath MSY is a surplus yield which can be sustainably harvested without reducing population size at equilibrium, keeping the population at its maximum recruitment (however, annual angling can be seen as a modification of r in the equation -i.e. the environment has been modified, which means that the population size at equilibrium with almanac line-fishing is slightly beneath what Yard would be without it). Note that mathematically and in practical terms, MSY is problematic. If mistakes are made and even a tiny amount of fish are harvested each year in a higher place the MSY, populations dynamics imply that the total population will eventually decrease to zero. The actual conveying capacity of the surround may fluctuate in the real world, which means that practically, MSY may actually vary slightly from yr to year[38] [39] [40] (annual sustainable yields and maximum boilerplate yield attempt to accept this into business relationship).[ citation needed ] Other similar concepts are optimum sustainable yield and maximum economic yield, these are both harvest rates below MSY.[41] [42]

These calculations are used to determine fishing quotas.[ citation needed ]

Humans [edit]

Equally climate change becomes a bigger issue, it has moved from social and natural sciences to political debates.[43] Carrying capacity currently tends to exist thought of equally a natural and normal balance betwixt nature and humans. Conveying chapters depends on the amount of natural resources available to a population and how much of the resource is needed. When it began to exist used, it looked at human impacts on the environment or specific species. Anthropological criticisms of the concept of carrying chapters are that information technology does not successfully capture the nuances of how multilayered human and environment relationships are. Discussions of conveying capacity ofttimes utilize a framework that places undue blame on populations that oft feel the worse effects of climate change and ecology degradation. The Gwembe Tonga Research Project (GTRP) is a long term study in Africa, that uses the building of the Kariba Dam on the Zambezi River as a example study to explore the furnishings of large scale evolution on populations. The building of this dam and the subsequent flooding in the area displaced 57,000 people.[43] Increasing drought cycles along with displaced people joining land that was already populated caused a not bad deal of precarity for the displaced population, and kinship networks and dearth foods were utilized to deal with scarcity. The study was started in 1956. It originally wrapped up in 1962, just the researchers chose to keep indefinitely to amend understand the community and how it changes over time.[43] The population was resettled from development on Lake Kariba. Some of the villages were forced to settle below the new dam. Six thousand people settled in Lusitu, with very ethnically unlike people with around one thousand people and a new environment. Droughts in the area are becoming more frequent, and there are definitely some environmental costs. However, with GTRP, information technology has been found that there is no inevitable permanent impairment to the ecology. In Lusitu, there was a terrible drought betwixt 1994 and 1995, which resulted in no harvest.[43] However, the next yr, the people saw a expert harvest. It was not plenty for the whole population, but information technology was better than other years. The drought allowed the soil to rest, and lead to a bigger harvest than in recent years. The economy has been struggling since the copper industry collapsed in the 1970s.

For years, researchers take attempted to measure human carrying chapters with numbers, but there is not a model that works for every town, city, or country. Some of the issues that cause this are as follows[43]

  1. an assumption of equilibrium
  2. difficulty in measuring food amounts
  3. inability to take into business relationship preferences in taste and amount of labor
  4. supposition of full use of food resource
  5. assumption of similarity across landscapes
  6. assumption that the community is isolated
  7. non fully taking into consideration short- and long-term changes
  8. does not address the standard of living

When applying carrying capacity to human populations, these eight issues should be considered. Carrying chapters assumes equilibrium, equally well every bit it's difficult to mensurate food sources. Non all foods are available all the fourth dimension, and at that place is a lot of variation in what is enough, as calories might exist privileged over nutritional value, and information technology'due south not possible to account for human being preferences. It also assumes that there is full use of food resources, which doesn't account for those same preferences or perhaps cultural taboos or lack of knowledge. There are likewise choices of when and where labor is invested, and these may differ generationally or across subsets of a population, as needs and goals affect priorities in different ways. Carrying capacity also assumes homogeneity across a mural, and that regions don't have a huge caste of variation and microcosms. Information technology also assumes populations and groups are isolated, and ignores the utilization of practices like support from kinship networks or migration. Other problems with conveying capacity are that information technology takes a historical view and ignores natural fluctuations, besides as it doesn't address bug specifically relevant to human populations, like a standard of living. The balance betwixt populations that carrying capacity intends to reverberate is more variable and circuitous than tin can be analyzed but past this concept. Some contempo scientists believe that humans are constantly adjustable, and then there is no limitation that would completely wipe them out. Others think that humans overusing resources will subtract the carrying capacity overall.[43]

Run into also [edit]

  • Tourism conveying capacity
  • Inflection bespeak
  • Optimum population
  • Overpopulation in wild animals
  • Overshoot (population)
  • Population environmental
  • Population growth
  • r/Grand selection theory
  • Toxic capacity
  • ecological footprint and biocapacity

Farther reading [edit]

  • Kin, Cheng Sok, et al. "Predicting World's Carrying Capacity of Human Population every bit the Predator and the Natural Resource every bit the Prey in the Modified Lotka-Volterra Equations with Time-dependent Parameters." arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05002 (2019).

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b Chapman, Eric J.; Byron, Carrie J. (January 2018). "The flexible awarding of carrying capacity in ecology". Global Ecology and Conservation. 13: e00365. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2017.e00365.
  2. ^ Mathis Wackernagel, Niels B. Schulz, Diana Deumling, Alejandro Callejas Linares, Martin Jenkins, Valerie Kapos, Chad Monfreda, Jonathan Loh, Norman Myers, Richard Norgaard, and Jørgen Randers, 2002, Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy, PNAS July ix, 2002 99 (14) 9266-9271; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142033699
  3. ^ Garver One thousand (2011) "A Framework for Novel and Adaptive Governance Approaches Based on Planetary Boundaries" Colorado State University, Colorado Conference on Earth Organization Governance, 17–twenty May 2011.
  4. ^ Turner, Graham (2008) "A comparison of The Limits to Growth with 30 years of reality" Archived 28 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine Democracy Scientific and Industrial Inquiry Organization (CSIRO) Sustainable Ecosystems.
  5. ^ Barnosky, AD; Hadly, EA; et al. (2012). "Approaching a country shift in Earth's biosphere". Nature. 486 (7401): 52–58. Bibcode:2012Natur.486...52B. doi:x.1038/nature11018. hdl:10261/55208. PMID 22678279. S2CID 4788164.
  6. ^ Verhulst, Pierre-François (1838). "Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement" (PDF). Correspondance Mathématique et Physique. 10: 113–121. Retrieved 3 December 2014.
  7. ^ a b Berkshire encyclopedia of sustainability. Dandy Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group. 2010–2012. ISBN978-one-933782-01-0. OCLC 436221172.
  8. ^ a b c d Sayre, N. F. (2008). "The Genesis, History, and Limits of Carrying Chapters". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 98 (1): 120–134. doi:10.1080/00045600701734356. JSTOR 25515102. S2CID 16994905.
  9. ^ Zimmerer, Karl Southward. (1994). "Human Geography and the "New Ecology": The Prospect and Promise of Integration" (PDF). Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 84: 108–125. doi:x.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01731.x.
  10. ^ a b c d Dhondt, André A. (Jan 1988). "Carrying capacity - a confusing concept". Acta Oecologica. 9 (4): 337–346. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
  11. ^ a b McLeod, Steven R. (September 1997). "Is the Concept of Carrying Chapters Useful in Variable Environments?". Oikos. 79 (3): 529–542. doi:ten.2307/3546897. JSTOR 3546897.
  12. ^ Leopold, Aldo (1933). Game Management. New York: Charles Sccribener'due south Sons. p. 51.
  13. ^ Odum, Eugene P. (1959). Fundamentals of Ecology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia and London: West. B. Saunders Co. pp. 183-188. ISBN9780721669410. OCLC 554879.
  14. ^ a b c Storch, David; Okie, Jordan Thou. (October 2019). "The carrying capacity for species richness". Global Environmental and Biogeography. 28 (10): 1519–1532. doi:ten.1111/geb.12987. S2CID 202026304.
  15. ^ Rees, William East. (October 1992). "Ecological footprints and appropriated conveying capacity: what urban economic science leaves out". Surroundings and Urbanization. 4 (ii): 121–130. doi:ten.1177/095624789200400212.
  16. ^ Verhulst, Pierre-François (1838). "Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement" (PDF). Correspondance Mathématique et Physique. 10: 113–121. Retrieved 3 December 2014.
  17. ^ Verhulst, Pierre-François (1845). "Recherches mathématiques sur la loi d'accroissement de la population" [Mathematical Researches into the Law of Population Growth Increment]. Nouveaux Mémoires de fifty'Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles. 18: 1–42. Retrieved 2013-02-18 .
  18. ^ Swafford, Angela Lynn. "Logistic Population Growth: Equation, Definition & Graph." Study.com. N.p., 30 May 2015. Spider web. 21 May 2016. "Logistic Population Growth - Boundless Open Textbook." Dizzying. N.p., due north.d. Spider web. 21 May 2016.
  19. ^ Martire, Salvatore; Castellani, Valentina; Sala, Serenella (2015). "Carrying capacity cess of forest resources: Enhancing environmental sustainability in free energy production at local scale". Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 94: 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.002.
  20. ^ Seidl, Irmi; Tisdell, Clem A (December 1999). "Carrying chapters reconsidered: from Malthus' population theory to cultural carrying capacity" (PDF). Ecological Economics. 31 (3): 395–408. doi:x.1016/S0921-8009(99)00063-iv.
  21. ^ Hui, C (2006). "Carrying capacity, population equilibrium, and environs's maximal load". Ecological Modelling. 192 (1–2): 317–320. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.001.
  22. ^ a b "4 - Determine carrying chapters and stocking charge per unit". More than Beef from Pastures. Meat & Livestock Australia Limited. 2019. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
  23. ^ Chesterton, Chris, Revised Calculation of Livestock Units for College Level Stewardship Agreements, Technical Advice Note 33 (Second edition), Rural Development Service, 2006 Archived June 26, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  24. ^ Nix, J. 2009. Farm Direction Pocketbook. 39th Ed. Corby: The Andersons Eye.
  25. ^ New Zealand Livestock Units on Ruralfind Archived 2010-05-25 at the Wayback Machine
  26. ^ Cornforth, I S and Sinclair, A G, Fertiliser Recommendations for Pastures and Crops in New Zealand, 2nd Ed (New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture, Wellington, New Zealand, 1984), quoted in A History of the Stock Unit System, New Zealand Ministry building of Agronomics Archived 2010-05-23 at the Wayback Machine
  27. ^ Jasper Womach, Study for Congress: Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition "Archived re-create" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-02-12. Retrieved 2011-12-10 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived re-create as championship (link)
  28. ^ Coefficients de conversion des animaux en unités de gros bétail (French): Conversion factors for livestock units.
  29. ^ La Commission Européen: Agronomics et Environnement (French) Archived 2010-01-02 at the Wayback Car European Commission, Agronomics and Surroundings (English version).
  30. ^ top agrar 11/2001, o.due north.A.
  31. ^ a b "P Chilonda and J Otte, Indicators to monitor trends in livestock production at national, regional and international levels, Livestock Enquiry for Rural Development, 18 (8), 2006, Commodity #117".
  32. ^ a b "Compendium of Agricultural-Ecology Indicators, Annexe 2: Definitions, Nutrient and Agronomics Organization of the United nations (includes different values for diverse regions)" (PDF).
  33. ^ FAO paper nearly Tropical Livestock Units Archived 2011-02-23 at the Wayback Machine
  34. ^ Quinn, Terrance J. (28 June 2008). "Ruminations on the development and futurity of population dynamics models in fisheries". Natural Resource Modeling. 16 (4): 341–392. doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.2003.tb00119.ten.
  35. ^ Tsikliras, Athanassios C.; Froese, Rainer (2019). "Maximum Sustainable Yield". Encyclopedia of Ecology (2nd ed.). Elsevier. pp. 108–115. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10601-3. ISBN9780444641304. S2CID 150025979.
  36. ^ Bousquet, N.; Duchesne, T.; Rivest, L.-P. (2008). "Redefining the maximum sustainable yield for the Schaefer population model including multiplicative environmental noise" (PDF). Journal of Theoretical Biology. 254 (ane): 65–75. Bibcode:2008JThBi.254...65B. doi:x.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.025. PMID 18571675.
  37. ^ Thorpe, R.B.; LeQuesne, W.J.F.; Luxford, F.; Collie, J.Southward.; Jennings, S. (2015). "Evaluation and management implications of doubtfulness in a multispecies size-structured model of population and community responses to fishing". Methods in Ecology and Development. half-dozen (1): 49–58. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12292. PMC4390044. PMID 25866615.
  38. ^ Milner-Gulland, E.J., Mace, R. (1998), Conservation of biological resources Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-86542-738-9
  39. ^ Larkin, P. A. (1977). "An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield". Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 106 (1): 1–eleven. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1977)106<1:AEFTCO>2.0.CO;2.
  40. ^ Botsford, 50.Westward.; Castilla, J.C.; Peterson, C.H. (1997). "The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems". Scientific discipline. 277 (5325): 509–515. doi:ten.1126/science.277.5325.509.
  41. ^ Clark, C.W. (1990), Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resource, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York
  42. ^ National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 1996. Our Living Oceans: Written report on the Status of U.S. Living Marine Resources 1995. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS0F/SPO-xix. NMFS, Silverish Springs, Physician.
  43. ^ a b c d e f Cliggett, Lisa. "Carrying Capacity'due south New Guise". The Environment in Anthropology. ii: 11–101.

How Does Carrying Capacity Affect The Size Of A Population,

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrying_capacity

Posted by: weesnerforgand57.blogspot.com

0 Response to "How Does Carrying Capacity Affect The Size Of A Population"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel